We require grant applicants to complete a logic model to help both your organization and our foundation understand what the participants in your program will be expected to accomplish with our grant. We believe that you will find logic modeling an excellent way to establish clear plans for a possible grant, manage your program as it unfolds, and pave the way for a fair evaluation of your work.
These are all the things you will do during the life of the grant to realize the outcomes you expect. Each of your entries should state WHAT will be provided to WHOM and WHEN.
If you are applying for a general operating grant, this first section of your logic model should specify the major activities of your organization.
The Apple Agency will continue to provide:
These are concrete, measurable goals that your program participants will accomplish in the short-term during the life of your grant from the foundation.
General, passive statements such as “students will have an opportunity to…” or “youth will develop to their fullest potential…” will not be accepted.
As some more complex or multi-stage interventions may not have outcome results completed or fully measured or known by the end of the grant period, you should indicate results achieved to date, whether youth performance is “on-track,” discuss expected youth achievement outcomes by a specific date, and whether you are awaiting data from other partners to inform your program’s reportable outcomes.
Remember that YOU provide activities, not outcomes, which belong in the first section only.
Longer-term outcomes will ideally occur inside the time limit of your grant from the foundation. Some more complex or multi-stage interventions may not have outcome results completed or fully measured or known by the end of the grant period, so it is fine if some longer-term outcomes fall outside the grant period. In these cases, you may indicate results achieved to date and whether or not youth performance is “on-track,” discuss expected youth achievement outcomes by a specific date, and state whether or not you are awaiting data from other partners to inform your program’s reportable outcomes.
There is no universal timeframe that defines “shorter-term” and/or “longer-term.” The timeframe will be different for each applicant and program but the outcomes you expect first should go into section 2 of your model, and those you expect later should go into section 3.
Another name for a logic model is a theory of change, and this may help you think about creating a successful document. How, specifically, does your agency believe it will bring about concrete, measurable change among clients? Exactly what changes are expected?
Choose Your Longer-Term Outcomes First
Begin planning and writing your logic model from the bottom up, first specifying your longer-term objectives, then backing up to the shorter-term outcomes necessary to produce these longer-term goals, and, finally, listing your strategies for getting there. In other words, pick your destination first and then map out your route to that destination.
Make Sure Everything You Write Is CONCRETE, SPECIFIC, and MEASURABLE
Use Strong Verbs
State Activities and Outcomes ONE AT A TIME
Do Not Try to Make the Model Symmetrical
There is no expectation that you will list a specific number of outcomes. You might need five activities to produce three shorter-term outcomes and one longer-term outcome. Or you might have one activity from which you expect several shorter-term outcomes and several longer-term outcomes.
Check the Model to Make Sure It Is Logical
Bottom line: Can your activities really be expected to lead to the outcomes you describe?
When assessing education programs, we look to fund programs that will ultimately culminate in either a college degree or a credential that leads to self-sufficiency via a career. These programs can serve students at any point in their educational path but must focus on preparing students for success as they move throughout academic levels.
We give substantial weight to programs that critically assess their performance using objective criteria. We are particularly interested in programs that plan to demonstrate concrete behavioral outcomes such as:
Those applying for funding should offer evidence that the particular educational interventions they propose employ best practices and research-based interventions.
When assessing workforce development programs, we look for job access and persistence support programs that use a comprehensive approach and guide participants toward jobs that lead to economic self-sufficiency and opportunity for advancement. We look to measures of persistence after three to six months and one year. The foundation does not consider internships or other programs without an employer partner which is committed to providing full-time employment based on objective criteria, such as completion of training milestones or industry certifications.
When assessing programs for capacity-building and technical assistance grants, the foundation helps organizations meet challenges of infrastructure, board issues, and strategic direction. We aim to respond to grantee-identified needs through partnerships with organizations that specialize in targeted solutions that will ultimately help improve the services our grantees provide to youth.
Positive indicators of an organization’s potential to become more effective, efficient, and stable may include:
Capacity building and technical assistance include hands-on support where needed, working with a variety of stakeholders for collaboration, and exploring the complex needs of organizations seeking to move beyond the seed phase toward fully-scaled programming and infrastructure.